Economic Woman

Econometrics, gender, equity and more.

Posts Tagged ‘United Kingdom

Equal pay: The movie?

leave a comment »

Made in Dagenham premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival about a week ago. Were I a more professional blogger, I might have been there. But as it is, I’ll be seeing it in theatres sometime after October 1. So far, reviews are middling, but stay tuned!

Written by Allison

19 September 2010 at 5:33 pm

The financial crisis and Scottish money

with 5 comments

I’m visiting with my partner’s family in London and then Edinburgh this month, and last night at dinner I discovered an interesting little currency puzzle.

To understand it, you need some background. It won’t surprise you to hear that Scotland andEngland, both being part of the UK, use the same currency – pounds sterling. But if you haven’t visited Scotland, you might be surprised to see Scottish money. While paper money in England is issued by the Bank of England, in Scotland three large banks issue notes, complete with their logos: the Royal Bank of Scotland, the Bank of Scotland, and Clydesdale Bank.

By my entirely unscientifics survey of the dinner table, it is becoming increasingly difficult to use Scottish bank notes in England. When I last lived in Edinburgh and visited London, in 2006 and 2007, the odd ornery English shopkeeper would refuse to take Scottish money. But now the practice has apparently become so widespread that Scots are in the odd position of having to change their Scottish money into English money before travelling anywhere in England.

It turns out that Scottish bills are not legal tender. No one is compelled by law to accept them. Instead, they are promissory notes, literally a commitment by the issuing bank to pay a debt. Wikipedia gets into the specifics of this, which is confusing – the Bank of England’s notes are legal tender in England only, but not Scotland or Wales, though they are accepted anywhere.

So why is it so difficult to spend Scottish notes? I see three possible explanations:

  1. Irrational anti-Scottish prejudice.
  2. The belief that Scottish bank notes are easier to counterfeit than those issued by the Bank of England. (This is something usually offered as explanation by aforementioned ornery English shopkeepers, but it may or may not be a variation on #1.)
  3. Lack of confidence in the Scottish banks issuing promissory notes.

Any of these are plausible, but the one most likely to have changed since I last lived here is #3 – Scottish banks have been hit hard by the financial crisis. Really, what we may have here is two currencies pegged together but not moving together. At least one hotel in Hong Kong has come to the same conclusion, offering a different exchange rate for Scottish and English notes. Since that practice is preposterous in the UK – Scottish bank notes deposited into a Scottish bank could be withdrawn as English notes at any bank machine in England – the only option is to refuse to accept them.

What I cannot determine, this fine drizzly morning, is what would have happened to all those Scottish notes issued by RBS if that bank had not been bailed out. Commenters?

Written by Allison

15 July 2009 at 3:46 am

A study in contrasts

leave a comment »

This morning I read that New York Times magazine article about Cease Fire, an outreach program tackling the cycle of gun violence and retribution in Chicago. I won’t gush until I’ve seen some numbers, but it struck me as the sort of intellectual inspiration, pragmatism, and people that makes for great public policy.

Then this evening I read about this ass-backwards plan to encourage the police to hound youth on Britain’s council estates. (The headline: “Police should harass young thugs – Smith.”)

As part of the crackdown on bad behaviour, [Home Secretary Jacqui Smith] will urge police forces across the country to follow the example of Essex police, who have mounted four-day “frame and shame” operations by filming and repeatedly stopping identified persistent offenders on problem estates.

The programme in Essex has been successful, even though it may raise human rights issues about such tough tactics, especially if those harassed by the police have not been found guilty of any criminal offence.

Since it’s my expertise, let’s talk about sloppy reporting. What is “success” in this situation? A reduction in violent crime rates? Fewer arrests? Positive feedback from local residents? A glowing review in the local paper? Can we really get away with not narrowing this down?

On areas well beyond my expertise: what do you imagine these “identified persistent offenders” are more likely to do after receiving this sort of treatment: join a group like Cease Fire, or go out and shoot a cop?

Written by Allison

8 May 2008 at 1:58 am