Economic Woman

Econometrics, gender, equity and more.

Archive for August 2008

Off topic: Tomorrow’s reporters

with 4 comments

Thanks everyone, for bearing with me through exams. I’m finished now, so I will be posting more consistently. I will also be assuming one of my other roles, as the new Director of Training and Recruitment for Canada’s top student paper.

So here is my question for you, dear readers. If you could impart two or three skills, ethical guidelines or ways of thinking to the next generation of Canadian journalists, what would they be? Better grammar? A commitment to fact checking? Fantastic interviewing technique? Better basic math?

Written by Allison

14 August 2008 at 12:26 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged with

The Predator State and its prey

with one comment

Susan Feiner discusses James Galbraith’s The Predator State over at Talking Point Memo Cafe’s Book Club. She likes it. The piece quickly segues to a discussion of women’s role in the workplace and at home.

Today’s vision of full-employment rightly includes women. But wait. If women are fully employed what’s going to happen to children too young for school? How many kids catch the school bus at 8:15 and have parents that leave for work at 7:30? The standard workday ends at 5:00 but the school day ends at 3:00. Then there’s the care of the elderly and the infirm. And please, don’t forget to wash the dishes. If the economy is really going to serve the public interest we have to deal with these realities.

And hints at the Bergmann effect:

Today’s liberals are likely to suggest flextime and long paid leaves to improve women’s economic condition. Nonsense. The breadwinner/dependent ideal relies on the same tired logic that seeks energy efficiency through deregulation and economic development through free trade.

This is only vaguely related, but it strikes me that those who advocate for a return to full employment policy spend too much time arguing about morality and compassion when they should be arguing that fiscal policy actually works. Don’t most Keynesian sceptics object to fiscal policy on practical grounds? An ethical argument is of no relevance if you haven’t convinced your opponents that your policy will work. In any case, as in so many areas, I declare myself firmly on the fence. Or lying underneath it. Or something.

Written by Allison

14 August 2008 at 12:20 pm