<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The wage gap on Feministe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://economicwoman.com/2008/07/17/the-wage-gap-on-feministe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://economicwoman.com/2008/07/17/the-wage-gap-on-feministe/</link>
	<description>Econometrics, gender, equity and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:48:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison</title>
		<link>http://economicwoman.com/2008/07/17/the-wage-gap-on-feministe/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 04:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://economicwoman.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/the-wage-gap-on-feministe/#comment-251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#039;t seen that, but it looks fascinating. I will have a look. Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen that, but it looks fascinating. I will have a look. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lagged_variable</title>
		<link>http://economicwoman.com/2008/07/17/the-wage-gap-on-feministe/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lagged_variable]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://economicwoman.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/the-wage-gap-on-feministe/#comment-250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you haven&#039;t seen it, the QJE just published &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.econ.brown.edu/econ/events/MRApril17.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;an interesting paper&lt;/a&gt;, which argues that the gender wage gap has fallen approximately 0% in the last 30 years.  Instead, it used to be that low-potential-wage (&quot;ability&quot;, whatever) women used to disproportionately select into the marketplace and increasingly, now, high-potential-wage do.  So while average female wages have risen relative to males, the underlying returns, given other characteristics, have changed not-at-all.

Which has interesting corollaries that 1) the apparent change in the wage gap is, to a large degree, illusory, and 2) wage inequality among women (as among virtually every demographic group US) is growing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you haven&#8217;t seen it, the QJE just published <a href="http://www.econ.brown.edu/econ/events/MRApril17.pdf" rel="nofollow">an interesting paper</a>, which argues that the gender wage gap has fallen approximately 0% in the last 30 years.  Instead, it used to be that low-potential-wage (&#8220;ability&#8221;, whatever) women used to disproportionately select into the marketplace and increasingly, now, high-potential-wage do.  So while average female wages have risen relative to males, the underlying returns, given other characteristics, have changed not-at-all.</p>
<p>Which has interesting corollaries that 1) the apparent change in the wage gap is, to a large degree, illusory, and 2) wage inequality among women (as among virtually every demographic group US) is growing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

